Uzbekistan

Snapshot · 2026-06-24Model 1.0.0

AFC·Group K·FIFA #50

Knockout contender

Model rates them #33 by tournament-winner probability — 17 places higher than FIFA #50.

Rival
Portugal (#6)
Key
Eldor Shomurodov (FW)
Share this cardSave image

Final squad announced · Uzbekistan · 2026-06-02

Source: beIN SPORTS

WC2026 results

Record0W · 0D · 2L
Goals1:8 (-7)
Form
DateOpponentScoreResultVenue
Jun 17Colombia13LMexico City
Jun 23Portugal05LHouston
1

Tournament outlook

Analysis

Uzbekistan carry a <0.1% probability of winning the tournament (34th of 48). Drawn in Group K alongside Portugal, Colombia, DR Congo, they are projected at 38.8% to advance to the knockout stage.

How they play

Limited recent tournament data is available for Uzbekistan's tactical profile. Early indicators suggest a balanced approach.

Path to success

In Group K alongside Portugal, Colombia, DR Congo, Uzbekistan are projected at 38.8% to advance from the group stage. A competitive group-stage showing — taking points off higher-ranked opponents — would mark a successful campaign. The expanded 48-team format gives smaller federations more runway, and upsets in the group stage are a fixture of every World Cup.

What they must execute

Uzbekistan will need to leverage their strengths while managing the physical demands of a tournament spread across three host countries.

Controversial take

The model and FIFA rankings tell different stories for Uzbekistan. Model rates them #33 by tournament-winner probability — 17 places higher than FIFA #50.

Key numbers

<0.1%Win probability34th in field
1727Elo ratingRanked 38th globally
9.1Shots per 90bottom quartile (44th of 48)
13.7%Tournament goal probability — Eldor ShomurodovTop projected scorer in the squad (FW)
526 daysManager tenureFabio Cannavaro
38.8%Group stage advance probabilityGroup K

How they play

Style vs the 48-team field

Not enough recent match data on file to build a style profile for Uzbekistan. Insufficient match coverage.

Percentiles position Uzbekistan against the 48-team field. Higher means more of that trait, not better or worse. Press is inverted (lower PPDA = higher press); width uses crossing rate as a proxy; tempo is open-play passes per minute of possession. Descriptive style analytics; does not feed the published probabilities.

Group K finish · Uzbekistan

Monte Carlo, 100,000 sims

Top two advance to the round of 32; best 8 of 12 third-placed teams also qualify.

  • 1st (group winner)
    Advances to R32
    3.7%
  • 2nd (runner-up)
    Advances to R32
    13.0%
  • 3rd
    Advances only if among the best 8 of 12 third-placed teams
    40.9%
  • 4th
    Eliminated
    42.4%

Stage progression · Uzbekistan

, 100,000 sims
  1. 40.4%AdvAdvance from group
  2. 12.8%R16Round of 16
  3. 4.5%QFQuarter-final
  4. 1.4%SFSemi-final
  5. 0.4%FFinal
  6. 0.1%WinWin the tournament

Likely knockout path · Uzbekistan

Monte Carlo, 10,000 sims

Most frequent opponents per round, conditional on reaching it.

R32

Round of 32

R16

Round of 16

QF

Quarter-final

SF

Semi-final

F

Final

2

The squad

Confirmed squad

Model-predicted · snapshot 2026-05-28

Roster confirmed by the federation's official squad announcement. The XI/bench split below is the model's composite-rating ordering, not the head coach's lineup.

Goalkeepers (1)
PlayerStat
GK
Utkir YusupovCaps-drivenNavbahor
39c0.38
Defenders (4)
PlayerStat
DF
Rustam AshurmatovCaps-drivenEsteghlal
47c0.30
DF
Abdukodir KhusanovRating-drivenManchester City
25c0.81
DF
Khojiakbar AlijonovCaps-drivenPakhtakor
40c0.33
DF
Farrukh SayfievCaps-drivenNeftchi
44c0.14
Midfielders (3)
PlayerStat
MF
Otabek ShukurovCaps-drivenBaniyas
82c10assists0.40
MF
Odiljon HamrobekovCaps-drivenTractor
71c5assists0.34
MF
Jamshid IskanderovCaps-drivenNeftchi
37c5assists0.28
Forwards (3)
PlayerStat
FW
Eldor ShomurodovCaps-drivenİstanbul Başakşehir
90c44goals0.46
FW
Igor SergeevCaps-drivenPersepolis
81c24goals0.25
FW
Oston UrunovCaps-drivenPersepolis
40c10goals0.42
Bench

★ likely first sub badge on the top-3 by first-sub score within each position group, plus a late-game impact rating where club per-90 stats are available.

Goalkeepers (2)
PlayerStat
GK
Abduvohid NematovRating-drivenNasaf★ Likely first sub
7c0.57
GK
Botirali ErgashevRating-drivenNeftchi★ Likely first sub
2c0.25
Defenders (5)
PlayerStat
DF
Sherzod NasrullaevCaps-drivenNasaf★ Likely first sub
29c0.39
DF
Umar EshmurodovCaps-drivenNasaf
29c0.28
DF
Abdulla AbdullaevDibba Al Fujairah
16c0.31
DF
Jakhongir UrozovRating-drivenDinamo Samarqand★ Likely first sub
2c0.18
DF
Avazbek UlmasalievRating-drivenAGMK★ Likely first sub
0c0.14
Midfielders (5)
PlayerStat
MF
Azizjon GanievRating-drivenAl Bataeh★ Likely first sub
18c1assists0.48
MF
Akmal MozgovoyCaps-drivenPakhtakor★ Likely first sub
23c0.00
MF
Jasurbek JaloliddinovCaps-drivenSogdiana★ Likely first sub
1c0.00
MF
Umarali RakhmonalievCaps-drivenSabah
1c0assists0.00
MF0c0.00
Forwards (3)
PlayerStat
FW
Abbosbek Fayzullaevİstanbul Başakşehir★ Likely first sub
30c8goals0.66
FW
Dostonbek KhamdamovCaps-drivenPakhtakor★ Likely first sub
33c5goals0.22
FW
Azizbek AmonovCaps-drivenBuxoro★ Likely first sub
11c2goals0.00
How to read this squad4 columns explained
Pos
Broad position bucket — GK / DF / MF / FW.
Caps
Senior international appearances. Used by the model as a recency-weighted signal of how often the manager calls the player up.
Stat
Position-aware stat: career international goals for forwards; career international assists for midfielders (Transfermarkt); latest available Big-5 club season's total tackles for defenders (FBref); latest available Big-5 club season's save percentage for goalkeepers (FBref). Em-dash when no data is joined — most often for defenders and keepers at non-Big-5 clubs.
Rating
Composite rating (Model #4) — combines recent caps + goals, recent club xG and xAG per 90, position-relative quality, and call-up priors. Higher = the model thinks the player is more likely to start. Typically 0.9 (depth) to 2.5 (elite).
★ Likely first sub — the bench player the model rates most likely to be the first substitute for their position. Computed from a first-sub score (cap-recency + impact rating); ties broken by Rating.

Selection driver — coloured chips show which input dominates a player's selection score. Caps-driven = selected mainly on international experience. Rating-driven = selected mainly on club performance quality. Jersey-boosted = jersey number from a recent squad snapshot lifted their score. Goals-driven = international goal record was the decisive factor. No chip when the score is a balanced blend.

Squad cohesion

Projected XI · club overlap

Low coverage: 1/11 of the projected XI have club-minutes rows in our ratings table. Numbers below are structurally suppressed and should be read alongside the resolved count, not in isolation.

Pairwise club minutes
0.00%
Share of the 55-pair × 3000-minute ceiling. Higher = more of the XI plays together at club level.
Club concentration
1.000
How concentrated the XI is across clubs. 0.091 = 11 different clubs · 1.000 = all the same club.
Top-3 clubs share
100%
1 of 1 play for the three most common clubs in the XI.

Top clubs in projected XI

  • Roma1

Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →

Squad depth

Projected XI · replaceability

Most irreplaceable starters

  1. Abdukodir KhusanovCentre-backLikely cover: Umar Eshmurodov · 0.28Nasaf0.53gap to repl.
  2. Eldor ShomurodovStrikerLikely cover: no natural backupreplacement-level ST ~0.240.22gap to repl.
  3. Odiljon HamrobekovDefensive midfieldLikely cover: Abdulla Abdullaev · 0.31Dibba Al Fujairah0.03gap to repl.

Gap to repl. = how far this nation's rating at the position falls from the starter to his likely in-squad replacement (named above). Larger = harder to replace.

Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →

3

Group schedule

Group-stage schedule

MDDateOpponentVenue
1Jun 17, 2026ColombiaMexico City, Mexico
2Jun 23, 2026PortugalHouston, United States
3Jun 27, 2026DR CongoAtlanta, United States

Head-to-head matchups

Uzbekistan projected scorers →

4

Storylines

Storylines

Updated 28 days ago
Model bold

Model rates them #33 by tournament-winner probability — 17 places higher than FIFA #50.

League pedigree

Only 1 of 26 predicted-squad players played in a top-5 European league last season — the rest play home or in non-top-5 leagues.

Long-haul

Travels 35,992 km across 3 venues in the group stage — one of the longest itineraries in the field.

From the spot

Converted 4 of 5 career penalties (80%) — a reliable side from the spot in knockouts.

5

Form & track record

Video analysis: Uzbekistan

Performance data from official highlights analysis across 1 match. 1 players observed, 0 events tracked.

7
Utkir YusupovStandout performer

Despite conceding three goals, he made several crucial saves that kept Uzbekistan in the game for extended periods.

0
Goals
0
Shots
0
Fouls won
0
Cards
Rating spread(1 ratings)
8+ (0)7 (1)6 (0)5- (0)

Player ratings (1)

7
Utkir Yusupov1 app
7

Despite conceding three goals, he made several crucial saves that kept Uzbekistan in the game for extended periods.

gs-0227Despite conceding three goals, he made several crucial saves that kept Uzbekistan in the game for extended periods.

Match observations

  • gs-022The match was played at Mexico City Stadium.
  • gs-022Uzbekistan were making their debut in the competition.
  • gs-022Colombia showed strong attacking intent throughout the match, particularly through Luis Diaz.

Statistical profile

Balanced

Attack

Attack rating0.4340th/48
Shots per match9.144th/48

Defence

Defence rating0.6619th/48
Goalkeeper rating0.4739th/48

GK: Utkir Yusupov

Set pieces

Penalty conversion76.0%4th/48
Penalty save rate24.0%16th/48

Style

Possession43.6%43rd/48

Squad

Avg. minutes per starter1,08238th/48
Club familiarity0.00048th/48

Workload class: low

Attack and defence ratings from the model; style metrics from recent international matches; penalty rates via Bayesian estimation; goalkeeper rating from shot-prevention data. Rank is out of 48 tournament teams.

Where goals come from

Phase of play · scored & conceded

Uzbekistan hasn't appeared in the StatsBomb open-data tournaments, so there's no phase-of-play breakdown on file.

Group-stage matchups

vs Colombia2026-06-17
Win14.2%
Draw27.1%
Loss58.7%
Expected goals for0.51
Expected goals against1.64
Likeliest score0-1 (18.5%)
Both teams score32.8%
Clean sheet19.5%
vs Portugal2026-06-23
Win12.6%
Draw25.1%
Loss62.2%
Expected goals for0.51
Expected goals against1.90
Likeliest score1-0 (16.4%)
Both teams score34.7%
Clean sheet15.0%
vs DR Congo2026-06-27
Win37.6%
Draw31.4%
Loss31.1%
Expected goals for0.91
Expected goals against0.89
Likeliest score0-0 (17.5%)
Both teams score35.9%
Clean sheet41.2%

Probabilities from the calibrated ensemble model. xG from the Dixon–Coles fit. See each fixture page for full analysis.

Rating & probability history

12 snapshots · 2026-05-222026-06-24
Uzbekistan — Elo and tournament-winner probability over 12 snapshotsUzbekistan trajectory: 12 snapshots between 2026-05-22 and 2026-06-24 (33 days). Elo moved from 1727.0 to 1727.0 (0). Tournament-winner probability moved from <0.1% to 0.1% (0pp).Elo rating17171724173017372026-05-22 · Elo 1727.02026-06-06 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-06 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-07 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-07 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-07 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-08 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-08 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-10 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-10 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-23 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)2026-06-24 · Elo 1727.0 (0 vs prior)Tournament-winner probability0.0%0.4%0.8%1.1%2026-05-22 · <0.1% (CI 0.0%–0.1%)2026-06-06 · <0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-06 · <0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-07 · <0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-07 · 0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-07 · 0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-08 · <0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-08 · <0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-10 · 0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-10 · 0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (0pp vs prior)2026-06-23 · 0.2% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (+0.1pp vs prior)2026-06-24 · 0.1% (CI <0.1%–0.3%) (−0.1pp vs prior)snapshot date (2026-05-222026-06-24)

Uzbekistan trajectory: 12 snapshots between 2026-05-22 and 2026-06-24 (33 days). Elo moved from 1727.0 to 1727.0 (0). Tournament-winner probability moved from <0.1% to 0.1% (0pp).

Each point is one model build. The shaded band is the bootstrap 90% credible interval around the tournament-winner probability.

Recent form (10 matches)

Record4W · 5D · 1L
Goals157
Form
DateOpponentScoreResultCompetition
2026-03-30HVenezuela00DFIFA Series
2026-03-27HGabon31WFIFA Series
2026-01-26NChina PR22DFriendly
2025-11-18NIran00DAl Ain International Cup
2025-11-14NEgypt20WAl Ain International Cup
2025-10-13NUruguay12LFriendly
2025-10-10HKuwait20WFriendly
2025-06-10HQatar30WFIFA World Cup qualification
2025-06-05AUnited Arab Emirates00DFIFA World Cup qualification
2025-03-25AIran22DFIFA World Cup qualification

martj42 international results (CC0) · last 10 matches · ~2 years.

Head-to-head vs group opponents

OpponentMeetingsW-D-LLast meeting
Colombia10-0-12026Loss (13) · FIFA World Cup
Portugal10-0-12026Loss (05) · FIFA World Cup
DR Congo0No prior meetings

All meetings via the martj42 international results dataset.

Major tournaments — most recent appearance

TournamentYearFinishW-D-LSince then
AFC Asian Cup2024Quarter-finals2-3-0
  • New head coach since then — now Fabio Cannavaro (appointed 2025)
  • 13/16 of current pool (81%) were active that year

Source: FIFA archives. Penalty outcomes resolved to W/L.

Most similar past team-tournaments

Closest comparable teams from past major tournaments (1990-2024), by squad strength, group draw, and recent form. Shown for context, not a prediction.

  • Oman · Asian Cup 2004

    Exited at the group stage

    Comparable pre-tournament strength (Elo 1663) and group draw.

  • Saudi Arabia · World Cup 1998

    Exited at the group stage

  • Bahrain · Asian Cup 2015

    Exited at the group stage

Standard Pass

See all 104 match forecasts

Unlock match probabilities, expected goals, scoreline distributions, and per-player scoring chances across all 104 matches.

Get the Pass, $15

Every forecast graded against the real result, scored on 987 matches since 2014. See the scorecard.

24h money-back, no questions asked·No subscription, no auto-renewal·Access through 31 Dec 2026. See refund policy.