Group L · Matchday 1
EnglandvsCroatia
2026-06-17·15:00 localPredictions finalised
The forecast
Match-outcome probability
- England win56.5%
- Draw27.0%
- Croatia win16.5%
A clash of identities: England's balanced approach meets Croatia's structured-press style in a fixture the model gives to England at 57%.
Why the model says this
Favoring England
- ·England holds a significantly higher FIFA ranking at 4th globally, compared to Croatia's 10th position.
- ·The Elo rating system gives England a 90-point advantage over Croatia.
- ·England's projected expected goals (xG) of 1.41 is notably higher than Croatia's 0.9 xG.
- ·In 11 historical head-to-head encounters, England has secured 6 wins, while Croatia has won 3, with 2 draws.
Favoring Croatia
- ·Croatia maintains a strong global standing with a FIFA ranking of 10th, indicating a high-quality opponent.
- ·Croatia's recent competitive form includes 3 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 FIFA World Cup qualification matches.
- ·Croatia's playing style features a 'Structured press' with a 58.8 percentile press intensity, suggesting a disruptive defensive approach.
What the model can't fully price
- ·The model does not fully incorporate the impact of 4 players across both squads carrying a fitness doubt, including 1 projected starter.
Form check
England
DecliningEngland's recent form shows 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last six matches. While their World Cup qualification campaign concluded with four consecutive victories, their two most recent friendly fixtures resulted in a 1-1 draw and a 0-1 defeat.
66.7% win rate in their last 6 matches.
Croatia
SteadyCroatia has recorded 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last six outings. They finished their World Cup qualification strongly with three wins and a draw, though their most recent friendly ended in a 1-3 loss after a 2-1 friendly victory.
66.7% win rate in their last 6 matches.
Analysis
How it plays out
Croatia press high and force the tempo. England's balanced setup needs to absorb that pressure early and find the right moments to play forward. Croatia's aggressive press (PPDA 20.4) against England's deeper build-up (PPDA 23.5) creates a clear territory question: can Croatia force errors high up, or will England play through the press and find space behind it?
What decides it
Croatia press high (PPDA 20.4). If the press doesn't win the ball early, the space behind their back line becomes exposed. The scoring threat is evenly split: Harry Kane (6.4%) and Ante Budimir (7.3%).
Off the pitch
Zlatko Dalić (9 years in charge of Croatia) vs Thomas Tuchel (1 years). That tenure gap shows up in squad familiarity and set-piece coordination.
The angle
Likely the last World Cup for Ivan Perišić. Tournament experience at this level is hard to quantify but hard to replace.
▸Goals & scorelines
Likeliest score 1–0 (15.8%) · xG 1.4 - 0.7
Expected goals
Mean of the Dixon-Coles joint goal distribution. Same fit that produces the most-likely-scoreline list below.
Most likely scorelines
- 1–015.8%
- 1–113.1%
- 0–012.8%
- 2–011.3%
- 2–18.4%
From the Dixon-Coles joint Poisson with the low-score correction. Scorelines are listed in probability order; this is a description of the model's distribution, not a recommendation.
Most likely half-time scorelines
- 0–035.3%
- 1–023.2%
- 0–112.5%
- 1–19.4%
- 2–08.1%
Same Dixon-Coles fit as the full-time list above, with rates halved to a 45-minute window and the low-score correction applied to that 1st-half block. The 0-0 row sits higher here than at full-time because fewer minutes have elapsed.
Goal totals
- More than 0.5 goals87.2%
- More than 1.5 goals63.1%
- More than 2.5 goals35.4%
- More than 3.5 goals16.4%
- More than 4.5 goals6.3%
- More than 5.5 goals2.1%
- Both teams score40.0%
Each row is the probability the match finishes with more than the listed number of goals. Both-teams-to-score is the probability each side scores at least once. All values are marginals of the Dixon-Coles joint goal grid that produces the scoreline list above — not market lines or any other operator construct.
Event-typed probabilities
- England clean sheetOpposing team scores zero47.3%
- Croatia clean sheetOpposing team scores zero25.6%
Derived from the same Dixon-Coles joint distribution as the scoreline list. These are descriptive event probabilities — see CLAUDE.md §3/§4 (formerly COMPLIANCE.md §4.2.7) for the framing the project uses.
Win-margin probability
- England by 4+2.9%
- England by 3+9.4%
- England by 2+25.0%
- England by 1+50.8%
- Draw29.5%
- Croatia by 1+19.8%
- Croatia by 2+6.0%
- Croatia by 3+1.3%
- Croatia by 4+0.2%
Each row is the probability the match ends with the listed margin or larger in that direction. Marginal of the Dixon-Coles joint goal grid; the “by 1+” rows plus the draw row sum to 1.
▸How the match unfolds
Over 2.5 goals 35.4% · BTTS 40.0%
Game state through the match
- England ahead51.5%
- Level28.0%
- Croatia ahead20.5%
Probability of each game state at minutes 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 — derived from two independent thinned-Poisson processes with the Dixon-Coles per-team rates. The three lines always sum to 1 at each minute. The right column shows the state at the match's closing minute.
When the first goal arrives
- 0–1529.7%
- 15–3020.9%
- 30–4514.7%
- 45–6010.3%
- 60–757.3%
- 75–905.1%
- No goal12.1%
Probability the match's first goal arrives in each 15-minute window. Homogeneous Poisson with combined rate λ = λh + λa from the Dixon-Coles fit; the seven rows (six windows + no-goal tail) sum to 1.
Half-time / full-time grid
| HT ↓ / FT → | HEngland win | DDraw | ACroatia win |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEngland ahead | 32.6% | 4.1% | 0.8% |
| DLevel | 17.2% | 20.0% | 8.0% |
| ACroatia ahead | 1.7% | 4.0% | 11.5% |
Each cell is P(half-time result, full-time result). All nine cells sum to 1. Derived from a halved-λ Dixon-Coles fit for the first half plus an independent-Poisson second-half convolution.
Comeback probability
- England trail at HT, avoid defeat at FT5.7%
- Croatia trail at HT, avoid defeat at FT4.9%
Joint probability — P(side trailing at half-time AND avoiding defeat at full-time). NOT conditional on trailing at HT. Derived from the same half-time / full-time decomposition that produces the HT/FT grid above; a tied first half is neither a home nor an away comeback opportunity.
Cards
- Expected yellow cardsMean of the Poisson on total yellow cards.3.45
- Total yellows over 2.567.0%
- Total yellows over 3.545.3%
- Total yellows over 4.526.5%
- Any red cardP(at least one red card in the match).9.5%
Referee not yet assigned. Using the 2026 pool-mean per-match rate as a placeholder; the model picks up the referee's personal rate once the assignment is published. Total yellow cards modelled as a Poisson with mean equal to two team baselines plus the referee's deviation from the pool mean. Reds are modelled the same way, independently. See /docs/methodology/.
▸Teams & players
Top scorer: Budimir (7.3%)
Match detail
England
Model-rated key players: Harry Kane (FW) — P(scores) 6.4%; Marcus Rashford (FW) — P(scores) 6.9%; Ollie Watkins (FW) — P(scores) 3.1%.
England under Thomas Tuchel play a balanced game, holding 55% of the ball — among the highest in the tournament field. Their likely shape is a 4-1-4-1, though they have also used 4-3-3. They apply moderate pressing intensity (PPDA 23.5) and build patiently through midfield with 8.5 passes per attacking sequence. They favour high-quality chances (xG/shot 0.142, among the best in the field).
England will need to leverage their strengths while managing the physical demands of a tournament spread across three host countries. Managing the fitness of Tino Livramento could prove decisive — their availability transforms the team's ceiling.
Croatia
Model-rated key players: Ante Budimir (FW) — P(scores) 7.3%; Andrej Kramarić (FW) — P(scores) 1.8%; Igor Matanović (FW) — P(scores) 1.2%.
Croatia under Zlatko Dalić play a structured press game, holding 54% of the ball — among the highest in the tournament field. Their likely shape is a 4-3-3, though they have also used 4-2-3-1. They apply moderate pressing intensity (PPDA 20.4) and build patiently through midfield with 7.1 passes per attacking sequence. They favour high-quality chances (xG/shot 0.142, among the best in the field).
Croatia need their high press to force turnovers in dangerous areas — if opponents can play through the press, the space left behind is vulnerable. Physical conditioning and squad rotation will be critical to sustain pressing intensity across a long tournament. Managing minutes for Ivan Perišić across what could be seven matches will test the coaching staff's rotation planning.
England's predicted XI averages 2,119 club minutes over the 2024-25 season (moderate load). Croatia's predicted XI averages 2,049 club minutes over the 2024-25 season (moderate load).
England coverage: 79.0% (11/11 XI matched against the FBref Big-5) · Croatia: 68.0% (9/11).
England historically converts 15.2% of xG from set-pieces, contributing 0.21 expected set-piece goals in this fixture. Croatia converts 14.2% from set-pieces (0.11 expected). Combined, the model expects 0.31 set-piece goals across the 90 minutes.
- P(England scores set-piece goal) 18.8%
- P(Croatia scores set-piece goal) 10.1%
- P(set-piece goal in match) 27.0%
England: Trent Alexander-Arnold on corners (32 corners), Eberechi Eze on free kicks (per fbref 2022 23) · Croatia: Luka Modrić on corners (15 corners), Kristijan Jakić on free kicks (per fbref 2022 23)
If a penalty is awarded to England, the model gives 68.6% conversion, 75.0% for Croatia.
England primary PK: Marcus Rashford (6/8 in 2019-20, per fbref 2022 23) · Croatia primary PK: Ante Budimir (2/2 in 2021-22, per fbref 2022 23).
Derived from the model's per-fixture forecast joint and supporting reference data (predicted squads, set-piece xG share, PK posteriors, club minutes). See /docs/methodology/ for the full methodology.
Tactical forecast
- PPDA
- 23.5
- Possession
- 55%
- Directness (yds/pass)
- 4.5
- Long balls/90
- 36
- Set-piece xG
- 15%
- PPDA
- 20.4
- Possession
- 54%
- Directness (yds/pass)
- 5.2
- Long balls/90
- 31
- Set-piece xG
- 14%
Style profile per side from StatsBomb open-data aggregation across recent international tournaments (Euro 2020/2024, Copa America 2024, AFCON 2023, World Cup 2018/2022). The tactical-fingerprint badge maps each team’s observed style vector into one of eight canonical archetypes via a rule-based classifier; teams with fewer than three matches of qualifying coverage carry an “insufficient-data” label rather than being forced into a default. Sides outside the StatsBomb-open corpus use FotMob team match stats from recent qualifiers and friendlies instead (possession and shot volume only), marked as partial coverage. PPDA = passes the side allows per defensive action (lower = more intense press). Formation distributions are not yet produced — that head of the §2.7 classifier is pending its own data pull. See /docs/methodology/.
Squad depth
Most irreplaceable starters
England
- Marc GuéhiCentre-backCover: Jarell Quansah · 0.650.32gap
- Jude BellinghamAttacking midfieldCover: Morgan Rogers · 0.720.27gap
- Marcus RashfordWingerCover: Anthony Gordon · 0.620.19gap
Croatia
- Dominik LivakovićGoalkeeperCover: Ivor Pandur · 0.510.40gap
- Joško GvardiolCentre-backCover: Martin Erlić · 0.690.30gap
- Marin PongračićCentre-backCover: Martin Erlić · 0.690.16gap
Gap = how far a side's rating at the position falls from the starter to his likely in-squad replacement (named under each name). Larger = harder to replace. Descriptive metric, does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →
Match conditions
- AltitudeNear sea level168 m
- Avg temperatureFive-year mean over the tournament window29.4 °C
- Avg humidity63%
- Heat stressShade WBGT ~30.8 °CHigh heat stress
- Pitch surfacetemporary natural grass over artificial turf
Indoor artificial-turf stadium; a temporary natural-grass pitch on a sand root-zone is laid over the turf for the tournament.
Heat stress is a shade Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature proxy from the venue's climatology mean temperature and humidity; FIFA mandates cooling breaks at WBGT 32 °C. Afternoon kickoff (local time). These are long-window averages, not a match-day forecast, and they are not inputs to the forecast.
Top scorers · P(scores in this match)
- Harry KaneFW6.4%
- Marcus RashfordPKFW6.9%
- Ollie WatkinsFW3.1%
- Ante BudimirPKFW7.3%
- Andrej KramarićFW1.8%
- Igor MatanovićFW1.2%
Per-player scoring rate from Model #5 (`p_score_per_match`). Reflects each player's npxG/90, expected minutes, team xG share, and the average opposing-team defence. See /docs/methodology/.
Recent match form
Last match player ratings
England
vs DR Congo · avg 7.5
Croatia
vs Portugal · avg 7.0
Worked well: Their early goal and continued creation of scoring opportunities demonstrated their offensive capabilities.
Struggled: A significant weakness was their repeated failure to beat the offside trap, resulting in two disallowed goals.
Player scores from official highlight analysis of each team's most recent match. Observational, not a model input. Methodology →
Video analysis: player performance
Per-player ratings and event breakdowns from official highlights analysis. Tap a player to see their full match timeline.
8Harry Kane12'–42'Scored two crucial goals, including a penalty and a header, demonstrating his clinical finishing.
2goals1shots1on target1headers▼
Scored two crucial goals, including a penalty and a header, demonstrating his clinical finishing.
Match timeline
7Jude Bellingham47'–47'Scored England's third goal early in the second half, putting them ahead for good.
1goals▼
Scored England's third goal early in the second half, putting them ahead for good.
Match timeline
7Marcus Rashford85'–85'Scored England's fourth goal, extending their lead and securing the victory.
1goals▼
Scored England's fourth goal, extending their lead and securing the victory.
Match timeline
6Declan Rice52'–52'Registered a strong shot on goal that tested the Croatian goalkeeper.
1shots1on target▼
Registered a strong shot on goal that tested the Croatian goalkeeper.
Match timeline
7Baturina36'–36'Scored Croatia's first equalizer with a powerful and well-struck shot.
1goals▼
Scored Croatia's first equalizer with a powerful and well-struck shot.
Match timeline
7Musa45'–45'Scored Croatia's second equalizer just before half-time, keeping his team in the game.
1goals▼
Scored Croatia's second equalizer just before half-time, keeping his team in the game.
Match timeline
7Dominik LivakovicMade several crucial saves, including a penalty stop and a double save, despite his team conceding four goals.
Made several crucial saves, including a penalty stop and a double save, despite his team conceding four goals.
Match observations
- The match was played at Dallas Stadium.
- England wore white kits, while Croatia wore blue.
- England demonstrated effectiveness from set-pieces, scoring a penalty and a header from corners.
▸Under the hood
Model-by-model comparison
England vs Croatia
| Model | Weight | Home | Draw | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EloRating-based strength estimate | 32% | 58.5% | 22.0% | 19.5% |
| Dixon-ColesGoal-process model with low-score correction | 63% | 50.8% | 29.3% | 19.9% |
| Hierarchical PoissonBayesian model with confederation pooling | 6% | 50.5% | 28.0% | 21.5% |
| Bayesian stackingLearned-weight combination | — | 58.0% | 29.7% | 12.4% |
| Ensemble (published)Uniform average + isotonic calibration | — | 56.5% | 27.0% | 16.5% |
How each model works
- Elo
- Each team carries a single strength rating updated after every match by a margin-aware K-factor. Match probabilities come from the logistic function of the rating gap. Elo is fast-adapting but coarse — it sees only who won and by how much, not how the goals were scored.
- Dixon-Coles
- A Poisson regression on team-level attack and defence parameters, fitted via maximum likelihood with an exponential time-decay weighting. The Dixon-Coles correction adjusts the four low-score cells (0-0, 1-0, 0-1, 1-1) where independent Poisson underestimates dependence. Produces full scoreline distributions, not just H/D/A.
- Hierarchical Poisson
- A Bayesian Poisson model fitted via MCMC (PyMC) with hierarchical priors that pool attack and defence parameters within confederations. Shrinks small-sample teams toward their confederation mean — helpful for nations with few recent competitive fixtures. Slower to fit but better-calibrated on the tails.
- Bayesian stacking
- Optimises simplex weights (w_elo, w_dc, w_hp) to maximise the leave-one-out log-score across a walk-forward backtest (Yao et al. 2018). The result is a weighted average of the three component models' probabilities, then isotonic-calibrated. Adds no extra features — just learns which component to trust more from historical accuracy.
- Ensemble (published)
- Equal-weight average of all three component models, followed by per-class isotonic regression calibration fitted on 24 months of walk-forward out-of-fold predictions. This is the probability published on the site. The uniform mean is deliberately simple — it avoids overfitting to the stacking weights' training window.
Three independent component models feed two combination strategies. The uniform ensemble is the published probability; Bayesian stacking uses learned weights. Amber bars flag >5pp divergence from the published number. Full methodology
Probability decomposition (transparency surface)
- Baseline ensemble — P(England win)50.3%
- + Lineup contribution0.0pp
- + Style-matchup contribution0.0pp
- Published P(England win)50.3%
Decomposition of the published P(England win) into the calibrated- baseline plus contributions from the §2.3 expected-XI lineup delta and the §2.7 style-matchup interaction. The §2.7 roadmap is explicit that style effects are second-order to team strength — single-digit-percentage P(win) shifts on extreme style matchups, near-zero on balanced ones. We surface the decomposition for transparency even when the contributions are small; the baseline carries the prediction. Methodology: /docs/methodology.
For this fixture both contributions round to under 0.05pp — the fitted style-matchup pair effect is in the small-magnitude regime the model expects to dominate.
Head-to-head history
| Date | Competition | Venue | Score | Result | xG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2026 | FIFA World Cup | NArlington | 4–2 | W | — |
| 13 Jun 2021 | UEFA Euro | HLondon | 1–0 | W | 0.9–0.3 |
| 18 Nov 2018 | UEFA Nations League | HLondon | 2–1 | W | — |
| 12 Oct 2018 | UEFA Nations League | ARijeka | 0–0 | D | — |
| 11 Jul 2018 | FIFA World Cup | NMoscow | 1–2 | L | 0.6–1.9 |
| 9 Sep 2009 | FIFA World Cup qualification | HLondon | 5–1 | W | — |
England vs Croatia, every senior international meeting in the martj42 results dataset (score from England's perspective; H/A/N = home/away/neutral; xG where the upstream dataset covers the match). See all 12 meetings →
Latest news & match context
- France v Spain - who would England rather face in the World Cup final? · Daily Mirror — Football · 14 Jul
- England captain Harry Kane hits out at ITV interviewer Gabriel Clarke 'trying to create division' between Thomas Tuchel and Jude Bellingham with his questioning at the World Cup · Daily Mail — Football · 14 Jul
- England World Cup semi-final and final? A reminder of where and when! · Sky Sports — Football · 14 Jul
- England vs. Argentina ticket prices: How much do World Cup semifinal tickets cost? · USA Today · 14 Jul
- World Cup 2026: American Ismail Elfath to referee England v Argentina · BBC · 14 Jul
- Stage:
- Group L · Matchday 1
- Date:
- 17 Jun
Ranked by likely importance. None of these feed the forecast: the probabilities rest on team strength, venue conditions and the style matchup.
- 1.Squad availability: 1 carrying a fitness doubt across the two squads. The forecast does not adjust for who is missing: its lineup channel currently contributes zero, so this is context the probabilities do not include.
England
England: 1 carrying a fitness doubt.
- DoubtTino Livramento (defender) is carrying Knee injury — a depth-level fitness watch item.
Croatia
Croatia come in at close to full strength.
Both projected XIs look intact; the fitness concerns are at squad-depth level rather than among first-choice starters.
Availability from the predicted squads and injury feed; forecast adjustments from the model's own decomposition. See /docs/methodology/.
Standard Pass
This match is a free preview
You're seeing the model's full forecast for this fixture for free. Unlock the same depth: probabilities, expected goals, scoreline distributions, and per-player scoring, for all 104 matches with a Standard Pass, valid through the tournament.
Every forecast graded against the real result, scored on 987 matches since 2014. See the scorecard.
24h money-back, no questions asked·No subscription, no auto-renewal·Access through 31 Dec 2026. See refund policy.