공개적으로 측정

16 Jun 2026

아래 모든 확률은 킥오프 전에 공개되고 확정되었습니다. 이 페이지는 각 확률을 실제 결과와 비교해 채점합니다.

4경기 중 4경기 채점 완료
3
정확히 맞춤
높은 확신, 정확한 결과
1
탁월한 판단
실제 결과에 가장 높은 확률을 부여
0
예상대로
결과가 범위 안에 있었음
0
의외의 결과
모델이 예상하지 못한 결과

일별 평균: Nailed it

  • 채점 완료10 Jun 확정
    31
    • France · 실현57.4%
    • 무승부25.6%
    • Senegal16.9%
    판정
    Strong read

    France 3–1 Senegal was the outcome the model rated most likely (57.4% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.276, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    시장이 결과에 더 높은 확률을 부여

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    France
    9Kylian MbappéSTScored two decisive goals and was a constant, clinical threat in attack, leading his team to victory.
    8Bradley BarcolaLWCame off the bench to score a crucial goal with a composed finish, extending France's lead.
    7Mike MaignanGKMade crucial saves at key moments, maintaining his team's lead.
    Senegal
    8Édouard MendyGKMade numerous crucial saves, preventing France from scoring more goals and keeping Senegal in contention.
    7Ibrahim MbayeSTScored a late consolation goal, showing good footwork and a composed finish.
    6El Hadji Malick DioufSTHad an early shot on target, showing attacking intent.
  • 채점 완료10 Jun 확정
    14
    • Iraq9.1%
    • 무승부23.1%
    • Norway · 실현67.7%
    판정
    Nailed it

    Iraq 1–4 Norway was the outcome the model rated most likely (67.7% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.166, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    시장이 결과에 더 높은 확률을 부여

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Iraq
    6Unnamed Player #18STShowcased attacking intent but lacked decisive contributions to the scoreline.
    6Unnamed Player #15CMDisplayed emotion and intensity but without specific impactful actions in the match.
    Norway
    9Erling HaalandSTScored two crucial goals, leading Norway's attack and securing a dominant victory.
  • 채점 완료10 Jun 확정
    30
    • Argentina · 실현69.6%
    • 무승부22.3%
    • Algeria8.1%
    판정
    Nailed it

    Argentina 3–0 Algeria was the outcome the model rated most likely (69.6% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.149, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    시장이 결과에 더 높은 확률을 부여

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Argentina
    6Lautaro MartinezSTRegistered one shot on target that was saved, but otherwise had limited impact on the match events.
    6Julian AlvarezSTEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    6Nicolas GonzalezLWEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    Algeria
    7Luca ZidaneGKMade multiple crucial saves against Messi and Martinez, preventing Algeria from conceding more goals.
    6Fares ChaibiSTScored a goal that was subsequently disallowed due to a foul, limiting his overall positive impact.
    4Rafik BelghaliReceived a yellow card for a foul, which was his only notable action and a negative contribution.
  • 채점 완료10 Jun 확정
    31
    • Austria · 실현64.0%
    • 무승부21.6%
    • Jordan14.4%
    판정
    Nailed it

    Austria 3–1 Jordan was the outcome the model rated most likely (64.0% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.196, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    시장이 결과에 더 높은 확률을 부여

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Austria
    5Austria Player #16Committed a foul in a dangerous area, which could have led to a scoring opportunity for the opponent.
    3Austria Player #19Displayed poor discipline throughout the match, committing multiple fouls and receiving a yellow card.
    Jordan
    7Jordan Player #10Showed attacking intent and individual skill, creating opportunities despite some execution errors.
    6Jordan Player #23Consistently drew fouls from the opposition, indicating a disruptive presence and ability to retain possession under pressure.

See how the forecast holds up

OnThePitch grades every probability against what actually happens, and publishes the calibration in the open. Subscribe to follow the retrospectives and research as they ship — one email per post, no marketing.

Already read on Substack? Follow OnThePitch there — same posts, slightly different format.

Model report card — 16 Jun 2026 · onthepitch