公开检验

16 Jun 2026

下方每个概率都在开赛前发布并锁定。本页面将每个概率与实际结果进行对比评分。

已评分 4/4 场
3
精准命中
高置信度,结果正确
1
判断有力
对实际结果赋予了最高概率
0
符合预期
结果在预测范围之内
0
意外
模型未能预见到这一点

当日均值: Nailed it

  • 已评分锁定于 10 Jun
    31
    • France · 实际57.4%
    • 平局25.6%
    • Senegal16.9%
    结论
    Strong read

    France 3–1 Senegal was the outcome the model rated most likely (57.4% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.276, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市场对结果赋予了更高的概率

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    France
    9Kylian MbappéSTScored two decisive goals and was a constant, clinical threat in attack, leading his team to victory.
    8Bradley BarcolaLWCame off the bench to score a crucial goal with a composed finish, extending France's lead.
    7Mike MaignanGKMade crucial saves at key moments, maintaining his team's lead.
    Senegal
    8Édouard MendyGKMade numerous crucial saves, preventing France from scoring more goals and keeping Senegal in contention.
    7Ibrahim MbayeSTScored a late consolation goal, showing good footwork and a composed finish.
    6El Hadji Malick DioufSTHad an early shot on target, showing attacking intent.
  • 已评分锁定于 10 Jun
    14
    • Iraq9.1%
    • 平局23.1%
    • Norway · 实际67.7%
    结论
    Nailed it

    Iraq 1–4 Norway was the outcome the model rated most likely (67.7% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.166, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市场对结果赋予了更高的概率

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Iraq
    6Unnamed Player #18STShowcased attacking intent but lacked decisive contributions to the scoreline.
    6Unnamed Player #15CMDisplayed emotion and intensity but without specific impactful actions in the match.
    Norway
    9Erling HaalandSTScored two crucial goals, leading Norway's attack and securing a dominant victory.
  • 已评分锁定于 10 Jun
    30
    • Argentina · 实际69.6%
    • 平局22.3%
    • Algeria8.1%
    结论
    Nailed it

    Argentina 3–0 Algeria was the outcome the model rated most likely (69.6% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.149, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市场对结果赋予了更高的概率

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Argentina
    6Lautaro MartinezSTRegistered one shot on target that was saved, but otherwise had limited impact on the match events.
    6Julian AlvarezSTEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    6Nicolas GonzalezLWEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    Algeria
    7Luca ZidaneGKMade multiple crucial saves against Messi and Martinez, preventing Algeria from conceding more goals.
    6Fares ChaibiSTScored a goal that was subsequently disallowed due to a foul, limiting his overall positive impact.
    4Rafik BelghaliReceived a yellow card for a foul, which was his only notable action and a negative contribution.
  • 已评分锁定于 10 Jun
    31
    • Austria · 实际64.0%
    • 平局21.6%
    • Jordan14.4%
    结论
    Nailed it

    Austria 3–1 Jordan was the outcome the model rated most likely (64.0% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.196, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市场对结果赋予了更高的概率

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Austria
    5Austria Player #16Committed a foul in a dangerous area, which could have led to a scoring opportunity for the opponent.
    3Austria Player #19Displayed poor discipline throughout the match, committing multiple fouls and receiving a yellow card.
    Jordan
    7Jordan Player #10Showed attacking intent and individual skill, creating opportunities despite some execution errors.
    6Jordan Player #23Consistently drew fouls from the opposition, indicating a disruptive presence and ability to retain possession under pressure.

See how the forecast holds up

OnThePitch grades every probability against what actually happens, and publishes the calibration in the open. Subscribe to follow the retrospectives and research as they ship — one email per post, no marketing.

Already read on Substack? Follow OnThePitch there — same posts, slightly different format.

Model report card — 16 Jun 2026 · onthepitch