公開の場で検証

16 Jun 2026

以下のすべての確率はキックオフ前に公開され、確定されました。このページでは、それぞれを実際の結果と照らし合わせて採点します。

4試合中4試合を採点済み
3
的中
高い確信、正しい結果
1
鋭い読み
起こった結果に最も高い確率を与えた
0
想定内
結果は予想の範囲内だった
0
予想外
モデルはこの結果を予測できなかった

日別平均: Nailed it

  • 採点済み10 Junに確定
    31
    • France · 実現57.4%
    • 引き分け25.6%
    • Senegal16.9%
    判定
    Strong read

    France 3–1 Senegal was the outcome the model rated most likely (57.4% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.276, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市場が結果により高い確率を与えた

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    France
    9Kylian MbappéSTScored two decisive goals and was a constant, clinical threat in attack, leading his team to victory.
    8Bradley BarcolaLWCame off the bench to score a crucial goal with a composed finish, extending France's lead.
    7Mike MaignanGKMade crucial saves at key moments, maintaining his team's lead.
    Senegal
    8Édouard MendyGKMade numerous crucial saves, preventing France from scoring more goals and keeping Senegal in contention.
    7Ibrahim MbayeSTScored a late consolation goal, showing good footwork and a composed finish.
    6El Hadji Malick DioufSTHad an early shot on target, showing attacking intent.
  • 採点済み10 Junに確定
    14
    • Iraq9.1%
    • 引き分け23.1%
    • Norway · 実現67.7%
    判定
    Nailed it

    Iraq 1–4 Norway was the outcome the model rated most likely (67.7% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.166, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市場が結果により高い確率を与えた

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Iraq
    6Unnamed Player #18STShowcased attacking intent but lacked decisive contributions to the scoreline.
    6Unnamed Player #15CMDisplayed emotion and intensity but without specific impactful actions in the match.
    Norway
    9Erling HaalandSTScored two crucial goals, leading Norway's attack and securing a dominant victory.
  • 採点済み10 Junに確定
    30
    • Argentina · 実現69.6%
    • 引き分け22.3%
    • Algeria8.1%
    判定
    Nailed it

    Argentina 3–0 Algeria was the outcome the model rated most likely (69.6% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.149, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市場が結果により高い確率を与えた

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Argentina
    6Lautaro MartinezSTRegistered one shot on target that was saved, but otherwise had limited impact on the match events.
    6Julian AlvarezSTEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    6Nicolas GonzalezLWEntered the game as a substitute but had no specific actions mentioned in the match notes.
    Algeria
    7Luca ZidaneGKMade multiple crucial saves against Messi and Martinez, preventing Algeria from conceding more goals.
    6Fares ChaibiSTScored a goal that was subsequently disallowed due to a foul, limiting his overall positive impact.
    4Rafik BelghaliReceived a yellow card for a foul, which was his only notable action and a negative contribution.
  • 採点済み10 Junに確定
    31
    • Austria · 実現64.0%
    • 引き分け21.6%
    • Jordan14.4%
    判定
    Nailed it

    Austria 3–1 Jordan was the outcome the model rated most likely (64.0% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.196, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    市場が結果により高い確率を与えた

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Austria
    5Austria Player #16Committed a foul in a dangerous area, which could have led to a scoring opportunity for the opponent.
    3Austria Player #19Displayed poor discipline throughout the match, committing multiple fouls and receiving a yellow card.
    Jordan
    7Jordan Player #10Showed attacking intent and individual skill, creating opportunities despite some execution errors.
    6Jordan Player #23Consistently drew fouls from the opposition, indicating a disruptive presence and ability to retain possession under pressure.

See how the forecast holds up

OnThePitch grades every probability against what actually happens, and publishes the calibration in the open. Subscribe to follow the retrospectives and research as they ship — one email per post, no marketing.

Already read on Substack? Follow OnThePitch there — same posts, slightly different format.

Model report card — 16 Jun 2026 · onthepitch