Mesuré en public
21 Jun 2026
Chaque probabilité ci-dessous a été publiée avant le coup d'envoi et verrouillée. Cette page note chacune d'elles par rapport à ce qui s'est réellement passé.
Moyenne du jour : Within expectations
- 0 – 0
- Belgium54.0%
- Match nul · réalisé24.8%
- Iran21.2%
VerdictWithin expectationsBelgium 0–0 Iran was an outcome the model rated at 24.8% (24.8% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.903, worse than the 0.667 no-skill mark.
Bat les marchésA donné plus de probabilité au résultat
Match ratings
Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.
Belgium9Thibaut CourtoisGKHis numerous world-class saves were instrumental in keeping Belgium in the match and securing a point.8Romelu LukakuSTScored the vital equalizing goal, providing the attacking impetus Belgium needed to get back into the match.6Kevin De BruyneCMShowed moments of quality in attack but failed to convert a clear scoring opportunity.Iran8Mehdi TaremiSTScored a brilliant opening goal and was a constant threat, but missed a crucial late chance that could have secured the win.7Mahdi TorabiAMCreated a dangerous scoring opportunity by breaking through and hitting the post, almost giving Iran an early lead.7Mehdi GhayediLWCreated a significant scoring opportunity by chipping the goalkeeper, which required a brilliant save to deny him. - NotésVerrouillé 10 Jun3 – 1
- Egypt · réalisé53.9%
- Match nul28.2%
- New Zealand17.8%
VerdictStrong readEgypt 3–1 New Zealand was the outcome the model rated most likely (53.9% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.324, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.
Les marchés ont donné plus de probabilité au résultat
Match ratings
Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.
Egypt9Omar MarmoushSTScored two crucial goals with clinical finishing, putting Egypt back in the lead twice.9Mohamed SalahRWDelivered a standout offensive display with a powerful long-range goal and a composed penalty conversion.New Zealand - NotésVerrouillé 10 Jun4 – 0
- Spain · réalisé85.4%
- Match nul12.2%
- Saudi Arabia2.4%
VerdictNailed itSpain 4–0 Saudi Arabia was the outcome the model rated most likely (85.4% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.037, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.
Les marchés ont donné plus de probabilité au résultat
Match ratings
Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.
Spain7.5Ferran TorresSTContributed to Spain's dominant 4-0 victory, maintaining a strong collective performance throughout the match.7.5Mikel OyarzabalLWContributed to Spain's dominant 4-0 victory, maintaining a strong collective performance throughout the match.7.5Dani OlmoLWContributed to Spain's dominant 4-0 victory, maintaining a strong collective performance throughout the match.Saudi Arabia4Firas Al-BuraikanSTPart of a team that suffered a 4-0 defeat, struggling to contain the opposition and create offensive opportunities.4Salem Al-DawsariLWPart of a team that suffered a 4-0 defeat, struggling to contain the opposition and create offensive opportunities.4Mohamed KannoCMPart of a team that suffered a 4-0 defeat, struggling to contain the opposition and create offensive opportunities. - NotésVerrouillé 10 Jun2 – 2
- Cape Verde5.9%
- Match nul · réalisé21.4%
- Uruguay72.8%
VerdictSurprise resultCape Verde 2–2 Uruguay was an outcome the model rated at 21.4% (21.4% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 1.151, worse than the 0.667 no-skill mark.
Les marchés ont donné plus de probabilité au résultat
Match ratings
Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.
Cape Verde9Cabo Verde Player #13STScored two crucial goals, including a header and a composed chip, leading his team's comeback.Uruguay8Luis SuarezSTScored a spectacular opening goal with clinical finishing, providing a moment of individual brilliance.8Uruguay Player #9STScored a vital goal with good close control and a precise finish, briefly restoring his team's lead.
See how the forecast holds up
OnThePitch grades every probability against what actually happens, and publishes the calibration in the open. Subscribe to follow the retrospectives and research as they ship — one email per post, no marketing.
Already read on Substack? Follow OnThePitch there — same posts, slightly different format.