Haiti
Snapshot · 2026-06-11Model 1.0.0CONCACAF·C조·FIFA #84
Model rates them #45 by tournament-winner probability — 39 places higher than FIFA #84.
- 라이벌
- Brazil (#5)
- 핵심
- Dany Jean (FW)
토너먼트 전망
Analysis
Haiti carry a <0.1% probability of winning the tournament (43rd of 48). Drawn in Group C alongside Brazil, Morocco, Scotland, they are projected at 7.8% to advance to the knockout stage.
How they play
Limited recent tournament data is available for Haiti's tactical profile. Early indicators suggest a balanced approach.
Path to success
In Group C alongside Brazil, Morocco, Scotland, Haiti are projected at 7.8% to advance from the group stage. A competitive group-stage showing — taking points off higher-ranked opponents — would mark a successful campaign. The expanded 48-team format gives smaller federations more runway, and upsets in the group stage are a fixture of every World Cup.
What they must execute
Haiti will need to leverage their strengths while managing the physical demands of a tournament spread across three host countries.
Controversial take
The model and FIFA rankings tell different stories for Haiti. Model rates them #45 by tournament-winner probability — 39 places higher than FIFA #84.
Key numbers
How they play
Style vs the 48-team field
Not enough recent match data on file to build a style profile for Haiti. Insufficient match coverage.
Percentiles position Haiti against the 48-team field — higher means more of that trait, not better or worse. Press is inverted (lower PPDA = higher press); width uses crossing rate as a proxy; tempo is open-play passes per minute of possession. Descriptive style analytics; does not feed the published probabilities.
Group C finish · Haiti
Monte Carlo, 50,000 simsTop two advance to the round of 32; best 8 of 12 third-placed teams also qualify.
- 0.3%1st (group winner)Advances to R32
- 3.2%2nd (runner-up)Advances to R32
- 16.4%3rdAdvances only if among the best 8 of 12 third-placed teams
- 80.1%4thEliminated
Stage progression · Haiti
, 50,000 sims- 10.7%AdvAdvance from group
- 1.4%R16Round of 16
- 0.2%QFQuarter-final
- <0.1%SFSemi-final
- 0.0%FFinal
- 0.0%WinWin the tournament
Likely knockout path · Haiti
Monte Carlo, 10,000 sims스쿼드
Predicted squad
Model-predicted · snapshot 2026-05-28No jersey numbers assigned in the underlying source. The 26 below are picked by the model from the team's recent call-up pool.
★ likely first sub badge on the top-3 by first-sub score within each position group, plus a late-game impact rating where club per-90 stats are available.
▸How to read this squad— 4 columns explained
- Pos
- Broad position bucket — GK / DF / MF / FW.
- Caps
- Senior international appearances. Used by the model as a recency-weighted signal of how often the manager calls the player up.
- Stat
- Position-aware stat: career international goals for forwards; career international assists for midfielders (Transfermarkt); latest available Big-5 club season's total tackles for defenders (FBref); latest available Big-5 club season's save percentage for goalkeepers (FBref). Em-dash when no data is joined — most often for defenders and keepers at non-Big-5 clubs.
- Rating
- Composite rating (Model #4) — combines recent caps + goals, recent club xG and xAG per 90, position-relative quality, and call-up priors. Higher = the model thinks the player is more likely to start. Typically 0.9 (depth) to 2.5 (elite).
Selection driver — coloured chips show which input dominates a player's selection score. Caps-driven = selected mainly on international experience. Rating-driven = selected mainly on club performance quality. Jersey-boosted = jersey number from a recent squad snapshot lifted their score. Goals-driven = international goal record was the decisive factor. No chip when the score is a balanced blend.
Squad cohesion
Projected XI · club overlap
Low coverage: 2/11 of the projected XI have club-minutes rows in our ratings table. Numbers below are structurally suppressed and should be read alongside the resolved count, not in isolation.
- Pairwise club minutes
- 0.00%
- Share of the 55-pair × 3000-minute ceiling. Higher = more of the XI plays together at club level.
- Club concentration
- 0.500
- How concentrated the XI is across clubs. 0.091 = 11 different clubs · 1.000 = all the same club.
- Top-3 clubs share
- 100%
- 2 of 2 play for the three most common clubs in the XI.
Top clubs in projected XI
- Nantes1
- Wolverhampton Wanderers1
Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →
Squad depth
Projected XI · replaceability
Most irreplaceable starters
- Jean-Kévin DuverneCentre-backLikely cover: Keeto Thermoncy · 0.00Young Boys0.82gap to repl.
- Hannes DelcroixCentre-backLikely cover: Keeto Thermoncy · 0.00Young Boys0.61gap to repl.
- Jean‐Ricner BellegardeCentral midfieldLikely cover: no natural backupreplacement-level CM ~0.280.55gap to repl.
Gap to repl. = how far this nation's rating at the position falls from the starter to his likely in-squad replacement (named above). Larger = harder to replace.
Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →
조별 리그 일정
Group-stage schedule
상대 전적
주요 이야기
Storylines
Updated 14 days agoModel rates them #45 by tournament-winner probability — 39 places higher than FIFA #84.
Only 2 of 25 predicted-squad players played in a top-5 European league last season — the rest play home or in non-top-5 leagues.
Converted only 3 of 5 career penalties (60%) — a wasteful record from the spot in knockouts.
First World Cup as head coach, appointed 2024.
폼 및 과거 기록
Statistical profile
BalancedAttack
Defence
GK: Johny Placide
Set pieces
Style
Squad
Workload class: low
Attack and defence ratings from the model; style metrics from recent international matches; penalty rates via Bayesian estimation; goalkeeper rating from shot-prevention data. Rank is out of 48 tournament teams.
Where goals come from
Phase of play · scored & conceded
Haiti hasn't appeared in the StatsBomb open-data tournaments, so there's no phase-of-play breakdown on file.
Group-stage matchups
Probabilities from the calibrated ensemble model. xG from the Dixon–Coles fit. See each fixture page for full analysis.
Rating & probability history
10 snapshots · 2026-05-22 → 2026-06-10Haiti trajectory: 10 snapshots between 2026-05-22 and 2026-06-10 (19 days). Elo moved from 1532.0 to 1532.0 (0). Tournament-winner probability moved from 0.0% to 0.0% (0pp).
Each point is one model build. The shaded band is the bootstrap 90% credible interval around the tournament-winner probability.
Recent form (10 matches)
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | NIceland | 1–1 | D | Friendly |
| 2026-03-28 | NTunisia | 0–1 | L | Friendly |
| 2025-11-18 | NNicaragua | 2–0 | W | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-11-13 | NCosta Rica | 1–0 | W | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-10-13 | AHonduras | 0–3 | L | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-10-09 | ANicaragua | 3–0 | W | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-09-09 | ACosta Rica | 3–3 | D | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-09-05 | NHonduras | 0–0 | D | FIFA World Cup qualification |
| 2025-06-22 | AUnited States | 1–2 | L | Gold Cup |
| 2025-06-19 | NTrinidad and Tobago | 1–1 | D | Gold Cup |
martj42 international results (CC0) · last 10 matches · ~2 years.
Head-to-head vs group opponents
| Opponent | Meetings | W-D-L | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 0-0-3 | 2016 — Loss (1–7) · Copa América |
| Morocco | 0 | — | No prior meetings |
| Scotland | 0 | — | No prior meetings |
All meetings via the martj42 international results dataset.
Major tournaments — most recent appearance
| Tournament | Year | Finish | W-D-L | Since then |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold Cup | 2025 | Group stage | 0-1-2 |
|
| Copa América | 2016 | Group stage | 0-0-3 |
|
| FIFA World Cup | 1974 | Group stage | 0-0-3 |
|
Source: FIFA archives. Penalty outcomes resolved to W/L.
Most similar past team-tournaments
Closest comparable teams from past major tournaments (1990-2024), by squad strength, group draw, and recent form. Shown for context, not a prediction.
United States · World Cup 1990
Exited at the group stage
Comparable pre-tournament strength (Elo 1586) and group draw.