公开检验

4 Jul 2026

下方每个概率都在开赛前发布并锁定。本页面将每个概率与实际结果进行对比评分。

已评分 1/3 场
0
精准命中
高置信度,结果正确
1
判断有力
对实际结果赋予了最高概率
0
符合预期
结果在预测范围之内
0
意外
模型未能预见到这一点

当日均值: Strong read

  • 评分中
    终场哨已响;即将评分
  • 评分中
    终场哨已响;即将评分
  • 已评分锁定于 28 Jun
    10
    • Colombia · 实际62.5%
    • 平局27.1%
    • Ghana10.3%
    结论
    Strong read

    Colombia 1–0 Ghana was the outcome the model rated most likely (62.5% before kickoff). The match scores a Brier of 0.225, better than the 0.667 no-skill mark.

    Match ratings

    Player scores from official highlights analysis. Observational, not a model input.

    Colombia
    8Luis SuarezSTShowcased excellent skill and delivered a precise assist for the match-winning goal, demonstrating his creative influence.
    7Luis DiazLWA dynamic attacking presence who consistently created chances but was let down by his finishing on two key opportunities.
    7MejiaAMCreated a significant scoring opportunity with a well-struck shot that required a top-class save from the opposition goalkeeper.
    Ghana
    9Ati-ZigiGKGhana's standout performer, making multiple heroic saves that kept the scoreline respectable and prevented a larger defeat.
    5ParteyCMHad an early attempt on goal but his overall impact on the match was limited to this single offensive action.
    5SemenyoSTShowed individual initiative by driving into the box but failed to connect with a teammate for a meaningful chance.

See how the forecast holds up

OnThePitch grades every probability against what actually happens, and publishes the calibration in the open. Subscribe to follow the retrospectives and research as they ship — one email per post, no marketing.

Already read on Substack? Follow OnThePitch there — same posts, slightly different format.

Model report card — 4 Jul 2026 · onthepitch