Round of 16 · Match 8

SwitzerlandvsColombia

2026-07-07·13:00 local·BC Place · VancouverPredictions finalised

Snapshot · 2026-07-09Model 1.0.0Final prediction · locked 7 Jul, 18:31 UTCSwitzerland·Colombia·
Full time · forecast gradedSwitzerland 0 0 ColombiaThe locked pre-match forecast has been graded against this result.See the calibration recap →

Match signals

Factors that favour each side, from statistical models to group stage form and match conditions. Longer bars = stronger advantage.

SwitzerlandSignal balanceColombia
32%68%

Colombia are the clear favourites (48% to Switzerland's 26%), and 11 of the wider signals confirm it. A clear probability gap, though draws (27%) keep this from being one-sided.

📊What the Models Say

5 Colombia
28%Elo Rating Model50%
ModerateModerate

Rates teams by a single strength number updated after every match. Simpler but fast to react. It rates Colombia at 50% to win vs Switzerland at 28%.

26%Dixon-Coles Model44%
ModerateModerate

Simulates the goal-scoring process using attack and defence strength. The heaviest-weighted model. It rates Colombia at 44% to win vs Switzerland at 26%.

28%Hierarchical Poisson43%
SlightSlight

Groups teams by confederation to share information. Helps for teams with fewer matches. It rates Colombia at 43% to win vs Switzerland at 28%.

26%Final Ensemble48%
ModerateModerate

The published probability after calibration and adjustments. This is what the model says. It rates Colombia at 48% to win vs Switzerland at 26%.

0/3Model Agreement3/3
StrongStrong

All 3 models agree: Colombia is favoured. When models agree, the signal is stronger.

Tournament Form

2 Switzerland1 Colombia
11pts (3W 2D 0L)Tournament Record11pts (3W 2D 0L)
Even

Both collected similar points: Switzerland 11pts (3W 2D 0L), Colombia 11pts (3W 2D 0L).

1.8/matchGoals Scored1.0/match
ModerateModerate

Switzerland averaged 1.8 goals per match vs Colombia's 1.0. More firepower coming in.

0.6 conceded/matchDefence0.2 conceded/match
SlightSlight

Colombia conceded just 0.2 goals/match vs Switzerland's 0.6. Tighter at the back.

+6Goal Difference+4
SlightSlight

Switzerland's goal difference of +6 is better than Colombia's +4. They outperformed opponents by more.

📈Momentum

2 Switzerland
+21.8Tournament Rating Change+10.5
SlightSlight

Switzerland's rating rose +21.8 during the tournament while Colombia's moved +10.5. The tournament has been kinder to Switzerland.

+0.0101Player Form Trend-0.0002
StrongStrong

Switzerland's players improved their form ratings during the tournament (+0.0101) vs Colombia (-0.0002). Players trending upward.

🏆Team Quality

1 Switzerland3 Colombia
1889Overall Strength (Elo)1975
SlightSlight

Colombia is rated 1975 vs Switzerland's 1889 (gap: 86). That's a noticeable gap in historical team strength.

0.94 xGExpected Chance Creation1.32 xG
ModerateModerate

The model expects Colombia to create 1.32 expected goals vs Switzerland's 0.94. More and better chances projected.

0.52Star Power0.23
ModerateModerate

Switzerland's top 3 starters are harder to replace (avg VORP 0.52) than Colombia's (0.23). More star power in key positions.

0.012Squad Familiarity0.022
SlightSlight

Colombia's starters play together at club level more often (0.022 cohesion) than Switzerland's (0.012). More shared understanding on the pitch.

🌍Match Conditions

2 Colombia
8,347kmTravel Distance6,755km
SlightSlight

Colombia traveled 6,755km vs Switzerland's 8,347km. A shorter journey means less fatigue.

9h shiftTimezone Shift2h shift
StrongStrong

Colombia face a 2h timezone shift vs Switzerland's 9h. Less jet lag disruption.

17 signals across 5 categories. Signal strength reflects how large the gap is between the two teams on each factor. Signals are descriptive, not prescriptive.

Tahmin

Match-outcome probability

  • Switzerland win
    24.9%
  • Draw
    26.7%
  • Colombia win
    48.4%

The model rates Colombia as favourites at 48%, with Switzerland projected at 26% to win.

Likeliest score1–113.7%
First goal0-15'31.4%
Both teams score45.4%
Over 2.5 goals39.4%
Top scorerRodríguez8.9%
Expected goals0.9 - 1.3
Loading pitch visualisation...

Goller ve skorlar

Likeliest score 1–1 (13.7%) · xG 0.9 - 1.3

Expected goals

Switzerland
0.94
Colombia
1.32

Mean of the Dixon-Coles joint goal distribution. Same fit that produces the most-likely-scoreline list below.

Most likely scorelines

  • 1–1
    13.7%
  • 0–1
    13.0%
  • 0–0
    11.2%
  • 0–2
    9.1%
  • 1–0
    9.0%

From the Dixon-Coles joint Poisson with the low-score correction. Scorelines are listed in probability order; this is a description of the model's distribution, not a recommendation.

Most likely half-time scorelines

  • 0–0
    32.9%
  • 0–1
    20.7%
  • 1–0
    14.5%
  • 1–1
    10.6%
  • 0–2
    7.1%

Same Dixon-Coles fit as the full-time list above, with rates halved to a 45-minute window and the low-score correction applied to that 1st-half block. The 0-0 row sits higher here than at full-time because fewer minutes have elapsed.

Goal totals

  • More than 0.5 goals
    88.8%
  • More than 1.5 goals
    66.8%
  • More than 2.5 goals
    39.4%
  • More than 3.5 goals
    19.3%
  • More than 4.5 goals
    7.9%
  • More than 5.5 goals
    2.8%
  • Both teams score
    45.4%

Each row is the probability the match finishes with more than the listed number of goals. Both-teams-to-score is the probability each side scores at least once. All values are marginals of the Dixon-Coles joint goal grid that produces the scoreline list above — not market lines or any other operator construct.

Event-typed probabilities

  • Switzerland clean sheetOpposing team scores zero26.7%
  • Colombia clean sheetOpposing team scores zero39.1%

Derived from the same Dixon-Coles joint distribution as the scoreline list. These are descriptive event probabilities — see CLAUDE.md §3/§4 (formerly COMPLIANCE.md §4.2.7) for the framing the project uses.

Win-margin probability

  • Switzerland by 4+
    0.5%
  • Switzerland by 3+
    2.5%
  • Switzerland by 2+
    9.3%
  • Switzerland by 1+
    25.7%
  • Draw
    29.6%
  • Colombia by 1+
    44.7%
  • Colombia by 2+
    21.2%
  • Colombia by 3+
    7.7%
  • Colombia by 4+
    2.2%

Each row is the probability the match ends with the listed margin or larger in that direction. Marginal of the Dixon-Coles joint goal grid; the “by 1+” rows plus the draw row sum to 1.

Maç nasıl şekillenir

Over 2.5 goals 39.4% · BTTS 45.4%

Game state through the match

0%25%50%75%100%0'15'30'45'60'75'90'
  • Switzerland ahead26.5%
  • Level28.0%
  • Colombia ahead45.5%

Probability of each game state at minutes 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90 — derived from two independent thinned-Poisson processes with the Dixon-Coles per-team rates. The three lines always sum to 1 at each minute. The right column shows the state at the match's closing minute.

When the first goal arrives

  • 0–15
    31.4%
  • 15–30
    21.5%
  • 30–45
    14.8%
  • 45–60
    10.1%
  • 60–75
    7.0%
  • 75–90
    4.8%
  • No goal
    10.4%

Probability the match's first goal arrives in each 15-minute window. Homogeneous Poisson with combined rate λ = λh + λa from the Dixon-Coles fit; the seven rows (six windows + no-goal tail) sum to 1.

Half-time / full-time grid

Joint probability of half-time and full-time results
HT ↓ / FT →HSwitzerland winDDrawAColombia win
HSwitzerland ahead15.3%4.5%1.8%
DLevel9.9%19.1%15.4%
AColombia ahead1.2%4.6%28.3%

Each cell is P(half-time result, full-time result). All nine cells sum to 1. Derived from a halved-λ Dixon-Coles fit for the first half plus an independent-Poisson second-half convolution.

Comeback probability

  • Switzerland trail at HT, avoid defeat at FT
    5.8%
  • Colombia trail at HT, avoid defeat at FT
    6.3%

Joint probability — P(side trailing at half-time AND avoiding defeat at full-time). NOT conditional on trailing at HT. Derived from the same half-time / full-time decomposition that produces the HT/FT grid above; a tied first half is neither a home nor an away comeback opportunity.

PK shootout simulator

If the match ends level after extra time, the model estimates the shootout outcome from each team's Bayesian-smoothed conversion / save rate (Model #15). The bracket simulator uses the symmetric (averaged) ordering; the two what-if scenarios below show how the win probabilities shift when conditioning on which team kicks first.

Symmetric (averaged over both orderings — used by the bracket simulator)
  • Switzerland
    46.2%
  • Colombia
    53.8%
If Switzerland kicks first
  • Switzerland
    58.5%
  • Colombia
    41.5%
If Colombia kicks first
  • Switzerland
    33.8%
  • Colombia
    66.2%
Expected paired rounds
4.8
Decided in regulation 5 kicks
72.9%

First-kicker advantage

The first kicker's per-kick conversion rate is scaled by ×1.050 (about +5.0%), stacked on the Markov chain's structural asymmetry. Real World Cup shootouts use a coin toss for kicker order, so on average the order is 50/50 — the symmetric path above is the relevant number for a single fixture. The ordering-conditioned probabilities are a descriptive what-if scenario.

Literature: first kickers win ≈ 60% historically (Apesteguia & Palacios-Huerta, American Economic Review 2010; Vandebroek et al. 2016).

Per-team posteriors: Switzerland conv 71.4%, save 20.0%Colombia conv 71.4%, save 22.9%. Smoothed against the global prior with prior strength 20 — see /docs/methodology/.

Takımlar ve oyuncular

Top scorer: Rodríguez (8.9%)

Match detail

Switzerland

Model-rated key players: Ricardo Rodriguez (DF) — P(scores) 7.0%; Breel Embolo (FW) — P(scores) 2.2%; Zeki Amdouni (FW) — P(scores) 1.2%.

How they play

Switzerland under Murat Yakin play a pragmatic game with 50% possession. Their likely shape is a 4-2-3-1, though they have also used 4-3-3. They apply moderate pressing intensity (PPDA 22.8).

What they must execute

Switzerland play a pragmatic, results-oriented game that adapts shape to the opposition. Tactical flexibility is their strength. The risk is inconsistency — without a default identity, a poor result can cascade if the team struggles to find a Plan B. Managing minutes for Remo Freuler across what could be seven matches will test the coaching staff's rotation planning.

Storylines
Form trend: Gained 79 international Elo points over the last 12 months — current rating 1950.
Top scorer: Breel EmboloModel's top anytime-scorer for the team — 27% probability of scoring at least once, rank #11 of all players.
Top-league core: 18 of 25 predicted-squad players played in a top-5 European league last season — top-tier league pedigree across the squad.

Colombia

Model-rated key players: James Rodríguez (MF) — P(scores) 8.9%; Luis Díaz (FW) — P(scores) 7.6%; Jhon Córdoba (FW) — P(scores) 4.2%.

How they play

Colombia under Néstor Lorenzo play a pragmatic game with 53% possession. They apply moderate pressing intensity (PPDA 18.9).

What they must execute

Colombia play a pragmatic, results-oriented game that adapts shape to the opposition. Tactical flexibility is their strength. The risk is inconsistency — without a default identity, a poor result can cascade if the team struggles to find a Plan B.

Storylines
Strong in goal: David Ospina#1 starting-GK rating in the field — 1.00 on club-derived save metrics across 48 teams.
Dead-ball: James RodríguezTakes corners, free kicks, and penalties — the team's dead-ball threat.
Newcomer: Cucho Hernández7 caps for the senior side, 27 at kickoff.
Workload going in

Switzerland's predicted XI averages 1,993 club minutes over the 2024-25 season (moderate load).

Switzerland coverage: 76.0% (11/11 XI matched against the FBref Big-5) · Colombia: 44.0% (9/11).

Set-piece outlook

Switzerland historically converts 10.3% of xG from set-pieces, contributing 0.10 expected set-piece goals in this fixture. Colombia converts 12.4% from set-pieces (0.16 expected). Combined, the model expects 0.26 set-piece goals across the 90 minutes.

  • P(Switzerland scores set-piece goal) 9.2%
  • P(Colombia scores set-piece goal) 15.1%
  • P(set-piece goal in match) 23.0%

Switzerland: Granit Xhaka on free kicks (per fbref 2022 23) · Colombia: James Rodríguez on corners (58 corners) (per fbref 2020 21)

Penalty outlook

If a penalty is awarded to Switzerland, the model gives 71.4% conversion, 71.4% for Colombia. If this match goes to a shootout, the symmetric (coin-toss averaged) win probability is 46.2% Switzerland / 53.8% Colombia.

Switzerland primary PK: Ricardo Rodriguez (1/2 in 2017-18, per fbref 2022 23) · Colombia primary PK: James Rodríguez (2/2 in 2013-14, per fbref 2020 21).

Derived from the model's per-fixture forecast joint and supporting reference data (predicted squads, set-piece xG share, PK posteriors, club minutes). See /docs/methodology/ for the full methodology.

Squad depth

Most irreplaceable starters

Switzerland

  1. Dan NdoyeWingerCover: Noah Okafor · 0.000.53gap
  2. Manuel AkanjiCentre-backCover: Aurèle Amenda · 0.360.53gap
  3. Nico ElvediCentre-backCover: Aurèle Amenda · 0.360.51gap

Colombia

  1. Luis DíazWingerCover: Jaminton Campaz · 0.630.31gap
  2. Cucho HernándezStrikerCover: Luis Suárez · 0.570.20gap
  3. Jhon AriasWingerCover: Jaminton Campaz · 0.630.17gap

Gap = how far a side's rating at the position falls from the starter to his likely in-squad replacement (named under each name). Larger = harder to replace. Descriptive metric, does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →

Match conditions

  • AltitudeNear sea level3 m
  • Avg temperatureFive-year mean over the tournament window17.4 °C
  • Avg humidity73%
  • Heat stressShade WBGT ~19.5 °CLow heat stress
  • Pitch surfacetemporary natural grass over artificial turf

Artificial-turf stadium with a retractable roof; a temporary natural-grass pitch is laid over the turf for the tournament.

Heat stress is a shade Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature proxy from the venue's climatology mean temperature and humidity; FIFA mandates cooling breaks at WBGT 32 °C. Afternoon kickoff (local time). These are long-window averages, not a match-day forecast, and they are not inputs to the forecast.

Top scorers · P(scores in this match)

Switzerland
Colombia

Per-player scoring rate from Model #5 (`p_score_per_match`). Reflects each player's npxG/90, expected minutes, team xG share, and the average opposing-team defence. See /docs/methodology/.

Recent match form

Last match player ratings

Switzerland

vs Algeria · avg 7.6

8
Johan ManzambiST
ATK
DEF
PAS
8
Breel EmboloST
ATK
DEF
PAS
8
Ricardo RodriguezLB
ATK
DEF
PAS
8
Swiss GoalkeeperGK
ATK
DEF
PAS
6
Denis ZakariaDM
ATK
DEF
PAS

Colombia

vs Ghana · avg 7.0

8
Luis SuarezST
ATK
DEF
PAS
7
Luis DiazLW
ATK
DEF
PAS
7
MejiaAM
ATK
DEF
PAS
6
QuinteroAM
ATK
DEF
PAS

Worked well: Their counter-attacking movements were effective, leading to the opening goal and several other clear-cut chances. The interplay between their attacking players, particularly Luis Suarez, was a key strength.

Struggled: Despite creating many opportunities, their finishing was not always clinical, allowing Ghana's goalkeeper to make several important stops and keeping the scoreline tight.

Player scores from official highlight analysis of each team's most recent match. Observational, not a model input. Methodology →

Perde arkası

Model-by-model comparison

Switzerland vs Colombia

Moderate (7.4%)
ModelWeightHomeDrawAway
EloRating-based strength estimate32%
28.4%
22.0%
49.6%
Dixon-ColesGoal-process model with low-score correction63%
26.4%
29.4%
44.2%
Hierarchical PoissonBayesian model with confederation pooling6%
28.1%
28.9%
43.0%
Bayesian stackingLearned-weight combination
24.3%
28.8%
46.9%
Ensemble (published)Uniform average + isotonic calibration
25.6%
26.5%
47.9%
Home spread: 2.0%
Draw spread: 7.4%
Away spread: 6.6%
How each model works
Elo
Each team carries a single strength rating updated after every match by a margin-aware K-factor. Match probabilities come from the logistic function of the rating gap. Elo is fast-adapting but coarse — it sees only who won and by how much, not how the goals were scored.
Dixon-Coles
A Poisson regression on team-level attack and defence parameters, fitted via maximum likelihood with an exponential time-decay weighting. The Dixon-Coles correction adjusts the four low-score cells (0-0, 1-0, 0-1, 1-1) where independent Poisson underestimates dependence. Produces full scoreline distributions, not just H/D/A.
Hierarchical Poisson
A Bayesian Poisson model fitted via MCMC (PyMC) with hierarchical priors that pool attack and defence parameters within confederations. Shrinks small-sample teams toward their confederation mean — helpful for nations with few recent competitive fixtures. Slower to fit but better-calibrated on the tails.
Bayesian stacking
Optimises simplex weights (w_elo, w_dc, w_hp) to maximise the leave-one-out log-score across a walk-forward backtest (Yao et al. 2018). The result is a weighted average of the three component models' probabilities, then isotonic-calibrated. Adds no extra features — just learns which component to trust more from historical accuracy.
Ensemble (published)
Equal-weight average of all three component models, followed by per-class isotonic regression calibration fitted on 24 months of walk-forward out-of-fold predictions. This is the probability published on the site. The uniform mean is deliberately simple — it avoids overfitting to the stacking weights' training window.

Three independent component models feed two combination strategies. The uniform ensemble is the published probability; Bayesian stacking uses learned weights. Amber bars flag >5pp divergence from the published number. Full methodology

Latest news & match context

Team news

No recent headlines for Switzerland or Colombia.

Match conditions
Stage:
Round of 16 · Match 8
Date:
7 Jul
Venue:
BC Place, Vancouver
Beyond the model

Ranked by likely importance. None of these feed the forecast: the probabilities rest on team strength, venue conditions and the style matchup.

  1. 1.Elimination stakes: A one-off elimination tie. Motivation, risk appetite and game management under tournament pressure are not model inputs; the forecast rests on team strength and the style matchup.
  2. 2.Rest differential: Switzerland have had 4 days since their previous match versus 3 for Colombia. Rest and recovery are not model inputs.
Availability

Switzerland

Switzerland come in at close to full strength.

Colombia

Colombia come in at close to full strength.

What it means

Switzerland and Colombia both come in at close to full strength, so the forecast rests on baseline team strength rather than late team-news swings.

Availability from the predicted squads and injury feed; forecast adjustments from the model's own decomposition. See /docs/methodology/.

Standard Pass

Bu maç ücretsiz ön izlemedir

Bu maç için modelin tam tahminini ücretsiz görüyorsunuz. Tüm 104 maç için aynı derinliği açın: olasılıklar, beklenen goller, skor dağılımları ve oyuncu bazında gol istatistikleri. Standard Pass turnuva sonuna kadar geçerlidir.

Pass'ı alın — $15

Every forecast graded against the real result, scored on 987 matches since 2014. See the scorecard.

24h money-back, no questions asked·No subscription, no auto-renewal·Access through 31 Dec 2026. See refund policy.