Jordan
Snapshot · 2026-06-11Model 1.0.0AFC·Girone J·FIFA #66
Model rates them #43 by tournament-winner probability — 23 places higher than FIFA #66.
- Avversario
- Argentina (#2)
- Legenda
- Ahmad Ersan (FW)
Prospettive nel torneo
Analysis
Jordan carry a <0.1% probability of winning the tournament (47th of 48). Drawn in Group J alongside Argentina, Austria, Algeria, they are projected at 21.5% to advance to the knockout stage.
How they play
Limited recent tournament data is available for Jordan's tactical profile. Early indicators suggest a balanced approach.
Path to success
In Group J alongside Argentina, Austria, Algeria, Jordan are projected at 21.5% to advance from the group stage. A competitive group-stage showing — taking points off higher-ranked opponents — would mark a successful campaign. The expanded 48-team format gives smaller federations more runway, and upsets in the group stage are a fixture of every World Cup.
What they must execute
Jordan will need to leverage their strengths while managing the physical demands of a tournament spread across three host countries.
Controversial take
The model and FIFA rankings tell different stories for Jordan. Model rates them #43 by tournament-winner probability — 23 places higher than FIFA #66.
Key numbers
How they play
Style vs the 48-team field
Not enough recent match data on file to build a style profile for Jordan. Insufficient match coverage.
Percentiles position Jordan against the 48-team field — higher means more of that trait, not better or worse. Press is inverted (lower PPDA = higher press); width uses crossing rate as a proxy; tempo is open-play passes per minute of possession. Descriptive style analytics; does not feed the published probabilities.
Group J finish · Jordan
Monte Carlo, 50,000 simsTop two advance to the round of 32; best 8 of 12 third-placed teams also qualify.
- 1.4%1st (group winner)Advances to R32
- 9.6%2nd (runner-up)Advances to R32
- 24.8%3rdAdvances only if among the best 8 of 12 third-placed teams
- 64.2%4thEliminated
Stage progression · Jordan
, 50,000 sims- 24.5%AdvAdvance from group
- 4.7%R16Round of 16
- 1.0%QFQuarter-final
- 0.2%SFSemi-final
- <0.1%FFinal
- 0.0%WinWin the tournament
Likely knockout path · Jordan
Monte Carlo, 10,000 simsLa rosa
Predicted squad
Model-predicted · snapshot 2026-05-28No jersey numbers assigned in the underlying source. The 26 below are picked by the model from the team's recent call-up pool.
★ likely first sub badge on the top-3 by first-sub score within each position group, plus a late-game impact rating where club per-90 stats are available.
▸How to read this squad— 4 columns explained
- Pos
- Broad position bucket — GK / DF / MF / FW.
- Caps
- Senior international appearances. Used by the model as a recency-weighted signal of how often the manager calls the player up.
- Stat
- Position-aware stat: career international goals for forwards; career international assists for midfielders (Transfermarkt); latest available Big-5 club season's total tackles for defenders (FBref); latest available Big-5 club season's save percentage for goalkeepers (FBref). Em-dash when no data is joined — most often for defenders and keepers at non-Big-5 clubs.
- Rating
- Composite rating (Model #4) — combines recent caps + goals, recent club xG and xAG per 90, position-relative quality, and call-up priors. Higher = the model thinks the player is more likely to start. Typically 0.9 (depth) to 2.5 (elite).
Selection driver — coloured chips show which input dominates a player's selection score. Caps-driven = selected mainly on international experience. Rating-driven = selected mainly on club performance quality. Jersey-boosted = jersey number from a recent squad snapshot lifted their score. Goals-driven = international goal record was the decisive factor. No chip when the score is a balanced blend.
Squad cohesion
Projected XI · club overlap
No club-minutes rows on file for any of the projected XI — this team draws its squad from leagues outside our coverage (Big-5 + understat). Cohesion can't be quantified here until additional league data is wired in.
Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →
Squad depth
Projected XI · replaceability
Most irreplaceable starters
- Musa Al-TaamariWingerLikely cover: Mohammad Abu Zrayq · 0.11Raja Casablanca0.49gap to repl.
- Yazan Al-ArabCentre-backLikely cover: Mohammad Abualnadi · 0.06Selangor0.23gap to repl.
- Noor Al-RawabdehCentral midfieldLikely cover: Amer Jamous · 0.00Al-Zawraa0.17gap to repl.
Gap to repl. = how far this nation's rating at the position falls from the starter to his likely in-squad replacement (named above). Larger = harder to replace.
Descriptive metric — does not feed the published probabilities. Methodology →
Calendario del girone
Group-stage schedule
Confronti diretti
Storie
Storylines
Updated 14 days agoModel rates them #43 by tournament-winner probability — 23 places higher than FIFA #66.
6 of 26 predicted-squad players play their club football for Al-Hussein — a single-club spine on the international side.
Only 0 of 26 predicted-squad players played in a top-5 European league last season — the rest play home or in non-top-5 leagues.
Travels 35,677 km across 2 venues in the group stage — one of the longest itineraries in the field.
Forma e bilancio storico
Statistical profile
BalancedAttack
Defence
GK: Yazeed Abulaila
Set pieces
Style
Squad
Attack and defence ratings from the model; style metrics from recent international matches; penalty rates via Bayesian estimation; goalkeeper rating from shot-prevention data. Rank is out of 48 tournament teams.
Where goals come from
Phase of play · scored & conceded
Jordan hasn't appeared in the StatsBomb open-data tournaments, so there's no phase-of-play breakdown on file.
Group-stage matchups
Probabilities from the calibrated ensemble model. xG from the Dixon–Coles fit. See each fixture page for full analysis.
Rating & probability history
10 snapshots · 2026-05-22 → 2026-06-10Jordan trajectory: 10 snapshots between 2026-05-22 and 2026-06-10 (19 days). Elo moved from 1690.0 to 1690.0 (0). Tournament-winner probability moved from 0.0% to 0.0% (0pp).
Each point is one model build. The shaded band is the bootstrap 90% credible interval around the tournament-winner probability.
Recent form (10 matches)
| Date | Opponent | Score | Result | Competition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | NNigeria | 2–2 | D | Friendly |
| 2026-03-27 | NCosta Rica | 2–2 | D | Friendly |
| 2025-12-18 | NMorocco | 2–3 | L | Arab Cup |
| 2025-12-15 | NSaudi Arabia | 1–0 | W | Arab Cup |
| 2025-12-12 | NIraq | 1–0 | W | Arab Cup |
| 2025-12-09 | NEgypt | 3–0 | W | Arab Cup |
| 2025-12-06 | NKuwait | 3–1 | W | Arab Cup |
| 2025-12-03 | NUnited Arab Emirates | 2–1 | W | Arab Cup |
| 2025-11-18 | NMali | 2–3 | L | Friendly |
| 2025-11-14 | ATunisia | 2–3 | L | Friendly |
martj42 international results (CC0) · last 10 matches · ~2 years.
Head-to-head vs group opponents
| Opponent | Meetings | W-D-L | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|---|
| Algeria | 2 | 0-1-1 | 2004 — Draw (1–1) · Friendly |
| Argentina | 0 | — | No prior meetings |
| Austria | 0 | — | No prior meetings |
All meetings via the martj42 international results dataset.
Major tournaments — most recent appearance
| Tournament | Year | Finish | W-D-L | Since then |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC Asian Cup | 2024 | Runner-up | 4-1-2 |
|
Source: FIFA archives. Penalty outcomes resolved to W/L.
Most similar past team-tournaments
Closest comparable teams from past major tournaments (1990-2024), by squad strength, group draw, and recent form. Shown for context, not a prediction.
Bahrain · Asian Cup 2015
Exited at the group stage
Comparable pre-tournament strength (Elo 1594) and group draw.
Saudi Arabia · World Cup 1998
Exited at the group stage
Oman · Asian Cup 2004
Exited at the group stage